Gpt 4 S Successes And Gpt 4 S Failures By Gary Marcus

Gpt 4 S Successes And Gpt 4 S Failures By Gary Marcus Although gpt 4 is clearly better than gpt 3 and 3.5, it is not so far as i can tell, qualitatively better, only quantitatively better; as noted above, the limits remain more or less the same. Picking only a handful of links means focusing on what’s relevant and useful. we favor timeless pieces—links with long shelf lives, articles that are still relevant one month, one year, or even ten years from now.

Gpt 4 S Successes And Gpt 4 S Failures By Gary Marcus At this time we should freeze gpt 4 for posterity. sure they can and will improve it, but now would be the time to hard code it’s weights in a chip. that way we could have a benchmark to compare future ais against. i’m impressed by its performance, for the record. Gpt 4 is amazing, and gpt 4 is a failure. i think we can call it shut on 'open' ai: the 98 page paper introducing gpt 4 proudly declares that they're disclosing *nothing* about the contents of their training set. Gpt is legitimately amazing. it can see (though we don't have a lot of details on that yet); it does astonishingly well on a whole bunch of standardized tests, like lsats, gres, and sats. It is a remarkable engineering achievement. as for gpt 4's impact on humanity, gpt will transform many jobs and companies and impact trillions of dollars in global gdp.

Gpt 4 S Successes And Gpt 4 S Failures By Gary Marcus Gpt is legitimately amazing. it can see (though we don't have a lot of details on that yet); it does astonishingly well on a whole bunch of standardized tests, like lsats, gres, and sats. It is a remarkable engineering achievement. as for gpt 4's impact on humanity, gpt will transform many jobs and companies and impact trillions of dollars in global gdp. Let’s once again go through a representative sample of marcus’ concerns about this new gpt version: gpt 4 also gave correct responses to these prompts (see the responses in this doc). In their own words: massive scaling has not thus far lead to revolution. although gpt 4 is clearly better than gpt 3 and 3.5, it is not so far as i can tell, qualitatively better, only quantitatively better; as noted above, the limits remain more or less the same. Gary marcus always has a measured and insightful response to widespread hype around the latest ai product launch. see: garymarcus.substack p gpt 4s successes and gpt 4s failures. This article has been adapted from the original version, which can be found on gary marcus'substack. gpt 4 is amazing yet also a failure, something which may be difficult to comprehend at first.
Comments are closed.