New York Times Addresses Its Shameful Coverage During Aids Crisis Pinknews

New York Times Addresses Its 'shameful' Coverage During AIDS Crisis | PinkNews

New York Times Addresses Its 'shameful' Coverage During AIDS Crisis | PinkNews The newspaper came under heavily criticism from aids activists and the lgbt community over its “shameful” coverage of the aids epidemic in the 1980s, when new york city’s gay community was ravaged by the spread of the disease. The new york times may be known as the “newspaper of record,” but nearly four decades ago, when the aids crisis began to ransack american cities, the publication’s coverage was sparse.

New York Times Addresses Its 'shameful' Coverage During AIDS Crisis | PinkNews

New York Times Addresses Its 'shameful' Coverage During AIDS Crisis | PinkNews New york times staffers reflect on the paper’s checkered past covering aids and gay culture — and what we can learn from it today. This content analytic study examines the frequency and content of coverage of hiv/aids in national and local u.s. daily newspapers from december 1992 through december 2007 with a focus on the presentation of risk by population subgroups. Whatever their causes, the mistakes of the '80s covering the aids crisis are infamous. Produced as an oral history of dozens of schmalz’s colleagues and friends, the book and an accompanying radio documentary focus on how journalism responded to the aids crisis in the 1980s and early ’90s, when many gay and lesbian journalists felt tremendous professional pressure to remain closeted, and discrimination against them was.

New York Times Addresses Its 'shameful' Coverage During AIDS Crisis | PinkNews

New York Times Addresses Its 'shameful' Coverage During AIDS Crisis | PinkNews Whatever their causes, the mistakes of the '80s covering the aids crisis are infamous. Produced as an oral history of dozens of schmalz’s colleagues and friends, the book and an accompanying radio documentary focus on how journalism responded to the aids crisis in the 1980s and early ’90s, when many gay and lesbian journalists felt tremendous professional pressure to remain closeted, and discrimination against them was. In a special issue of t magazine, the new york times reflected on how it lacked attention to lgbt culture as well as the largest story of the time: aids. the piece commissioned six lgbt editors to address the times ’s invisible homophobia during that decade. A new history of the new york times has revived a decades long debate about why the times failed to give aids the blanket coverage it deserved, after doctors discovered an often fatal disease they first believed only attacked gay men. Samuel g. freedman, a columbia journalism school professor and himself a new york times veteran, has written dying words: the aids reporting of jeff schmalz and how it transformed the new york times (available on amazon), accompanied by an audio documentary by radio producer kerry donahue. Throughout the 1980s in new york city, there was little government support for those who contracted the virus — a symptom of the era’s discrimination against minorities, intravenous drug.

1989: ACT UP AIDS Activist Takes On The New York Times.